All That’s Good by Hannah Anderson (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2018)
Discernment is not a word I use everyday. In this context, it described the goal of separating the inconvenient from the important; the mundane from the unforgettable. Previous generations did not have the internet, 24 hour television, and instant communication to tell us what was good. This book helped me to recognize that popularity or trendy does not always equal good. Anderson’s discussion of “filter bubbles” that we engage to keep us in our own “informational comfort zones” are real phenomena that can keep us from everything good and from thinking for ourselves.
It was interesting to read in print about the tendency we have to “feel” our way in the world, basing all of our decisions not upon data, research, or wisdom—but only on feelings. It is so common to read “follow your passion” and “follow your heart” as advice to everyone from high school graduates to people contemplating divorce. Feelings are a poor barometer and offer such limited wisdom as people navigate life. She reminded us created beings that we should be looking to our creator instead of an imagined muse for direction.
The chapter on truth brought in the aspect of confession that showed Anderson’s ability to make me think deeply about truth. She encouraged honesty both personally and corporately. The discussion on justice was solid; unlike the mushiness of that word being bandied about lightly. Justice is presented as a value but also as a goal that only God can judge. She fought against the superiority many have who have found themselves the “haves” who look down at the “have nots” who do not realize all we have or attain is the result of God’s mercy and grace.
Purity is undefiled. When there is any impurity in our lives, there is always the possibility to sin—the human condition. The commonly heard phrase “there but by the grace of God go I” may become a more understood phrase for me as I navigate life from this point further. The pursuit of purity is a task of society not just a pursuit of the individual. Anderson calls on us to speak well of what should be spoken well of. Silence cannot defend the oppressed and even helps the tormentor.
From a practical standpoint, Anderson footnoted her sources and showed a well-researched book. Her scriptural undergirding was foundational to her position but did not come off as preachy or condescending at all. The book has a comfortable “homey” feel to it. She pleaded her case with the skill of an attorney and the personality of the mother whose home everyone wants to go to.
